One way to improve the use and value of a token, is to introduce an entirely new token that is rewarded to holders or liquidity providers. Honestly though, I do think this approach has been too overdone lately and has inflated the cryptocurrency market with useless tokens left and right.

​

Questions such as this should be taken somewhat seriously though. For example, if someone TL FSN/FUSE for a long period of time (a year perhaps), then maybe this long term comitment is deserving of some kind of additional reward, The question is perhaps what? A new token? An existing token? The question is worth thinking about.

​

Another intersting question to consider is whether it would make since to give liquidity to an LP-token like FSN/FUSE, as a kind of second derivative of tokens. This would most likely mean that ANY rewards awarded to the original LP-token are awarded to the new LP contract (which means they're effectively burnt). Could AnySwap see some value in ANY getting burnt in this manner, and instead awarding some collected USDT, or whatever of equivalent value to the burnt ANY?

​

There's many scenarios to consider that could be interesting to play around with. But to make these kind of changes, it should be very important to have the active support of voting Fusionites, otherwise it's hard to make it feel valuable, regardless of how clever the tokenomic design may be.

​

The important takeaway though is that these type of things can be done, if we want them.